| Dimension | No Score | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | Peer Review Team Score | Teacher Score |
| Clarity of Purpose & Ideas & Organization of Supporting Data | No presentation made. | Purpose and main ideas not stated clearly and no supporting data given. | Purpose and main ideas stated, but supporting data or factual findings missing. | Purpose and main ideas clearly stated & supporting data is given. | Purpose and main ideas carefully explained along with all relevant data clearly explained sequentially. | ||
| Stage Presence, Speaking Ability, Voice Quality, Grammar & Audience Contact (average of group in general) | No presentation | At least one person in group had such an awkward delivery style or used such poor grammar, or had such poor voice quality or audience contact that it detracted from presentation. | Delivery style and volume of each member of the group was okay, but grammar, fluency, or pronunciation needed improvement in one or more members of the group. (Could be from lack of practice.) | Delivery style, voice tone & volume, grammar, fluency, and pronunciation of all members of group was effective and contributed to the presentation. (Showed evidence of practice and preparation.) | Delivery style, voice tonal quality and speaking ability of all members enhanced presentation with excellent inflection and expression by all. (Showed great deal of rehearsal and preparation to perfect.) | ||
| Explanation of Relevant Scientific & Sociological Principles | No attempt to explain scientific and /or sociological principles is evident. | One scientific or sociological principle is cited, but it is not applied appropriately nor explained correctly. | At least one relevant scientific principle and one sociological principle are cited and applied appropriately, but may not be explained correctly. | At least one relevant scientific principle and one sociological principle are cited and are applied appropriately and explained correctly. | All necessary relevant scientific and sociological principles are cited, applied appropriately, and all are explained correctly. | ||
| Creativity | No presentation | No original touches or creative ideas in presentation | At least one original touch or creative idea is evident. | Unique and creative presentation with several original touches. | Very clever or unique approach in which originality makes presentation entertaining as well as informative. | ||
| Visual Aids | None used | Visuals are poorly done, sloppy, irrelevant, inaccurate, and are not effective. | Visuals are neat, relevant, contain few errors, and contribute somewhat to presentation. | Visuals are clear, colorful, attractive, relevant, accurate, and enhance the presentation | Visuals look professional and are an integral part of a creative, well planned, multi- dimensional presentation. | ||
| (16 pts. possible) | Total pts. earned: | ||||||
| Average: | _____ | ____ |
Teacher comments (Required for scores below
2 on any dimension):